Format comparison

WebP vs PNG

PNG is the format designers reach for whenever they need transparency or pixel-perfect graphics. WebP offers both, plus a lossy mode that shrinks files by up to 80%. This comparison shows exactly where each format belongs.

Verdict
Use PNG as a working/source format and WebP for everything you publish. WebP lossless is ~26% smaller than PNG; WebP lossy with alpha is typically 60–80% smaller with no visible difference. Only serve PNG when a platform explicitly requires it.

Side by side

WebP vs PNG: feature comparison

CriterionPNGWebP
Lossless compressionYesYes (~26% smaller)
Lossy compressionNoYes
TransparencyYes (8-bit alpha)Yes (8-bit alpha)
AnimationAPNG (limited)Yes
Screenshot 1600 px1.4 MB220 KB (q90)
Logo with transparency48 KB14 KB (q92)
Browser support100%97%+
Editing / source formatExcellentGood

Transparency: the myth that keeps PNG alive

Many people still believe transparency requires PNG. It doesn't. WebP supports a full 8-bit alpha channel in both lossless and lossy modes. A transparent PNG logo converted to WebP at 90% quality keeps its soft anti-aliased edges and drops to a third of the size. For lossy WebP, the alpha channel is compressed losslessly by default, so edges never get blocky.

File size

PNG uses DEFLATE, the same algorithm as ZIP files. It works well on flat colour and repeated patterns and terribly on photographs and gradients. WebP lossless uses predictive coding with a local colour cache and beats PNG by about 26% on Google's test corpus. WebP lossy is a different league: screenshots typically shrink 80–85%, photographic PNGs 90%+.

Real-world examples (typical results)

ImagePNGWebP losslessWebP q85
Retina screenshot 2880×18003.9 MB2.7 MB480 KB
App icon 512×512 transparent96 KB68 KB24 KB
Chart with text 1200×700210 KB150 KB58 KB
Photo exported as PNG 2000 px5.6 MB4.1 MB310 KB

When PNG is still the right choice

  • As the master file you keep editing: lossless, universally supported by design tools.
  • When a platform requires PNG (some app stores, ad networks and print workflows).
  • For pixel art or tiny icons under 1 KB, where format overhead dominates.
  • When you need 16-bit per channel colour depth; WebP is 8-bit.

Quality settings for graphics

Screenshots, diagrams and UI graphics contain sharp edges and text. Use 85–92% quality in WebP to keep them crisp. Photographic content in a PNG wrapper can drop to 80%. Combine with downscaling to the actual display size for the largest gains.

See how much your PNGs shrink.

Try it on your own images

Convert a file to WebP in your browser and compare the size yourself. Free, no upload.

Open the converter

Frequently asked questions

Yes. WebP has an 8-bit alpha channel in both lossless and lossy modes, so transparent logos, icons and cut-outs convert without any loss of transparency.

Yes, about 26% smaller on average. Lossy WebP with alpha is 3–4× smaller still, with no visible difference for web use.

Yes. Keep PNG (or the design file) as your editable source and publish WebP. Never re-edit a lossy WebP repeatedly.

More comparisons

WebP vs JPEG

WebP wins for the web. It produces 25–35% smaller files than JPEG at equal visual quality, supports transparency and animation, and is displayed natively by 97%+ of browsers. Keep JPEG only as a fallback for legacy clients or when a platform does not accept WebP.

Read more

WebP vs GIF

WebP beats GIF in every technical dimension: 16.7 million colours vs 256, 8-bit alpha vs 1-bit, and 50–90% smaller files. Use WebP for still graphics and animations, and consider MP4/WebM video for longer clips.

Read more